Energy | ||||||
Unit | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
Energy consumption1 | PJ | 43.90 | 43.10 | 45.10 | 43.30 | 45.75 |
Fuel consumption within the organization | PJ | 57.15 | n.r. | n.r. | n.r. | n.r. |
Electricity consumption2 | PJ | 1.18 | n.r. | n.r. | n.r. | n.r. |
Heating, cooling and steam consumption | TJ | 100.3 | n.r. | n.r. | n.r. | n.r. |
Electricity sold | PJ | 14.2 | n.r. | n.r. | n.r. | n.r. |
1Refers to the total energy used for operations based on site calculations with specific data and methodology.
2 Includes only electricity/ heating/ cooling/ steam purchased and consumed. Electricity/ heating/ cooling/ steam/ consumed from own generation is included in fuel consumption.
n.r. = not reported
1 Scope 1 refers to direct emissions from operations that are owned or controlled by the organization. We use emission factors from different sources, e.g., IPCC, API GHG Compendium, etc. Since 2016 OMV Petrom is applying global warming potentials of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4 – 100 year)
2Scope 2 refers to indirect emissions resulted from generation of purchased or acquired electricity, heating, cooling, or steam. We use emission factors from different sources, e.g., national authorities, supplier-specific emission factors, etc. The data in the table refers to the market-based approach. The increase in 2020 was mainly due to the extended scope with filling stations, whose calculation of the Scope 2 emissions was prepared using the national emission factors for Romania and Moldova, and residual mix emission factors for Serbia and Bulgaria. Location based is 0.112 mn t CO2eq.
3 Scope 3 refers to other indirect emissions that occur outside the organization, including both Upstream and Downstream emissions. We use emission factors from different sources, e.g., IPCC, PlasticsEurope, etc. The data includes Scope 3 emissions from the use and processing of sold products. Pure “trading margin” sales as well as intracompany sales are excluded.
4 Decrease mainly due to the significant reduction of gas venting in Upstream
GHG Emissions | ||||||
Unit | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
GHG (direct, scope 1)1 | mn t CO2 eq | 3.99 | 4.24 | 4.50 | 3.99 | 4.40 |
of which from Upstream activities | mn t CO2 eq | 1.38 | 1.91 | 2.11 | 2.02 | 2.32 |
of which from Downstream | mn t CO2 eq | 2.60 | 2.34 | 2.39 | 1.98 | 2.07 |
CO2 | mn t | 3.57 | 3.43 | 3.62 | 3.18 | 3.29 |
N2O | t | 20 | 21 | 24 | 23 | 24 |
CH4 | t | 16,477 | 32,257 | 35,033 | 32,048 | 44,304 |
GHG (indirect, scope 2)² | mn t CO2 eq | 0.094 | 0.045 | 0.080 | 0.057 | 0.058 |
GHG (indirect, scope 3)³ | mn t CO2 eq | 24.74 | 26.06 | 23.24 | n.r | n.r |
Other air emissions | ||||||
Unit | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
SO2 | t | 614 | 613 | 572 | 630 | 679 |
NOx | t | 3,070 | 3,225 | 3,588 | 3,290 | 3,218 |
Non-methane-volatile organic compounds (NM-VOC)4 | t | 2,476 | 4,413 | 5,171 | 5,358 | 6,958 |
Particulate emissions | t | 62 | 64 | 59 | 62 | 63 |
Flaring and Venting | ||||||
Unit | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
Hydrocarbons flared | t | 27,146 | 36,494 | 41,797 | 38,667 | 22,189 |
Hydrocarbons vented1 | t | 16,155 | 33,639 | 36,834 | 31,348 | 48,233 |
1Decrease mainly due to improved / optimized gas infrastructure
Unit | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
GHG Intensity Upstream | t CO2 eq/ toe | 0.187 | 0.247 | 0.259 | 0.237 | 0.263 |
GHG Intensity Petrobrazi Refinery1 | t CO2 eq/ t throughput | 0.246 | 0.247 | 0.254 | 0.240 | 0.251 |
GHG Intensity CCPP1 | t CO2 eq/ MWh | 0.359 | 0.361 | 0.356 | 0.359 | 0.366 |
Carbon Intensity Index of Petrom2 | % | -7.5 | -2.4 | +5.4 | -6.3 | -5.9 |
1CO2 verified emissions
2CO2 equivalent emissions produced to generate a certain business output using the following business-specific metric (Upstream: t CO2 equivalent/toe produced, Refinery: t CO2 equivalent/t throughput,
Water | Unit | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
Water withdrawal | ||||||
Water withdrawn 1,2 | megalites | 59,362 | 17,930 | 18,290 | 16,750 | 17,590 |
thereof groundwater | megalitres | 5,700 | 5,780 | 5,190 | 7,080 | 6,600 |
thereof freshwater (≤1,000 mg/l total dissolved solids) | megaliters | 5,438 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof other water (>1,000 mg/l total dissolved solids) | megaliters | 262 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof surface water | megalitres | 11,360 | 11,050 | 11,840 | 8,450 | 9,730 |
thereof freshwater (≤1,000 mg/l total dissolved solids) | megaliters | 11,360 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof other water (>1,000 mg/l total dissolved solids) | megaliters | 0 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof from public supply systems | megalitres | 851 | 1,100 | 1,260 | 1,220 | 1,260 |
thereof freshwater (≤1,000 mg/l total dissolved solids) | megaliters | 851 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof other water (>1,000 mg/l total dissolved solids) | megaliters | 0 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof seawater | megaliters | 8 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof produced water | megaliters | 41,443 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
Water withdrawn by source from all areas with water stress 3 | megaliters | 510 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof groundwater | megaliters | 262 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof freshwater (≤1,000 mg/l total dissolved solids) | megaliters | 0 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof other water (>1,000 mg/l total dissolved solids) | megaliters | 262 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof surface water | megaliters | 0 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof freshwater (≤1,000 mg/l total dissolved solids) | megaliters | 0 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof other water (>1,000 mg/l total dissolved solids) | megaliters | 0 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof from public supply systems | megaliters | 49 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof freshwater (≤1,000 mg/l total dissolved solids) | megaliters | 49 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof other water (>1,000 mg/l total dissolved solids) | megaliters | 0 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof seawater | megaliters | 0 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof produced water | megaliters | 199 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
Water consumed 1 | megaliters | 27,649 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
Total water consumed from all areas with water stress 3 | megaliters | 322 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
Water recycled and reused | megaliters | 311,797 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
Wastewater discharged | Unit | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
Total water discharged to all areas by destination | megaliters | 9,730 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof Surface water | megaliters | 9,038 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof Groundwater | megaliters | 0 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof Seawater | megaliters | 8 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
thereof Third-party water | megaliters | 684 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
Total water discharge to all areas with water stress3 | megaliters | 11 | n.r | n.r | n.r | n.r |
Water discharged -quality | ||||||
Hydrocarbons (oil) discharged | t | 12 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 13 |
⃰ Excluding filling stations for which the process of data reporting is under development
1 Excluding water withdrawn for once-through use that is not applicable in OMV Petrom.
2 Increase due to the inclusion of produced water, according to GRI 303/2018 effective for reports after 1 January 2021. For comparison, the produced water in 2019 amounted to 43,200 megalitres
3 Applies to Kazakhstan
n.r – not reported
Unit | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
Freshwater Withdrawal Intensity Upstream | cbm/toe | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
Freshwater Withdrawal Intensity Downstream Oil1 | cbm/t throughput | 2.16 | 2.10 | 2.26 | 1.74 | 1.82 |
Freshwater Withdrawal Intensity Power Plants | cbm/MWh | 0.98 | 1.02 | 0.97 | 1.04 | 1.12 |
Freshwater Withdrawal Intensity Index of OMV Petrom2 | % | -0.2 | -4.7 | +11.5 | -3.3 | -6.2 |
1 Not including Power Plants
2 Weighted average of Freshwater Withdrawal Intensity variations from business divissions
Unit | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
Total waste1 | t | 537,855 | 527,928 | 430,431 | 367,205 | 812,360 |
thereof non-hazardous waste | t | 158,000 | 233,815 | 186,643 | 149,483 | 568,419 |
thereof non-hazardous waste to landfill | t | 49,599 | 81,666 | 36,656 | 18,500 | 99,091 |
thereof non-hazardous waste for valorization2 | t | 97,740 | 124,580 | 132,540 | 123,347 | 405,893 |
thereof non-hazardous waste for incineration | t | 210 | 23,810 | 678 | 91 | 173 |
thereof non-hazardous waste for other disposal options | t | 10,450 | 3,755 | 16,769 | 7,545 | 63,262 |
thereof hazardous waste | t | 379,855 | 294,113 | 243,788 | 217,722 | 243,941 |
thereof fazardous waste to landfill | t | 6,831 | 48,832 | 51,970 | 37,651 | 39,769 |
thereof hazardouswaste to valirization2 | t | 314,964 | 158,543 | 64,538 | 51,566 | 97,861 |
thereof hazardous waste for incineration | t | 13,786 | 892 | 2,393 | 4,380 | 11,053 |
thereof hazardous waste for other disposal options | t | 44,274 | 85,846 | 124,887 | 124,125 | 95,258 |
Waste directed to disposal | t | 125,150 | 244,805 | 233,353 | 192,292 | 308,606 |
Waste diverted from disposal (valorized) | t | 412,705 | 283,123 | 197,078 | 174,913 | 503,754 |
Waste (recovery or recycling) valorization2 rate | % | 77 | 53 | 46 | 48 | 62 |
* Excluding filling stations for which the process of data reporting is under development
1 Total waste amounts including those from one-time projects
2 “valorization” means diverted from disposal by recycling, recovery and preparing for use
Unit | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
Spills | number | 2,267 | 2,012 | 2,164 | 2,375 | 2,105 |
of which major (i.e. severity level 3 to 5) | number | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
of which minor (i.e. severity level below 3) | number | 2,267 | 2,011 | 2,162 | 2,375 | 2,104 |
Spills Volume | litre | 31,908 | 54,195 | 35,442 | 51,490 | 97,590 |
Environmental protection expenditure1 | Unit | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
Environmental protection expenditure, excluding depreciation | mn EUR | 70.48 | 124.29 | 96.87 | 103.69 | n.r |
Environmental investments for assets put into operation | mn EUR | 36.26 | 45.82 | 59.43 | 29.39 | n.r |
1When reporting Environmental protection expenditure, OMV Petrom uses the EMA (Environmental management accounting) methodology developed by International Federation Accountants (IFAC)